What is HS 760110?
HS 760110 covers unwrought, non-alloyed primary aluminium — commonly traded in ingot, T-bar, or sow form. It is produced through an energy-intensive electrolytic process (the Hall-Héroult process) using alumina as the primary feedstock, making electricity cost the single largest variable in smelter economics. This distinguishes it from secondary (recycled) aluminium and from alloyed unwrought aluminium, which falls under HS 760120.
End-use sectors are broad and strategically important: construction (structural profiles and cladding), automotive (lightweighting), aerospace, electrical infrastructure, and packaging. Because it sits at the start of the aluminium value chain, any supply disruption or cost spike at the ingot level propagates rapidly downstream.
Classification note: customs authorities in the EU and US scrutinise whether material is truly non-alloyed at import. Minor alloying additions can shift classification to 760120, with potential duty rate implications. Always verify mill certificates against the declared HS code.
Top Sourcing Countries for Primary Aluminium Ingot
Global export supply for HS 760110 is concentrated among a relatively small number of smelting nations, each carrying distinct risk and cost profiles:
- Russia (14.1% share, 34 markets): The largest single export origin by share, with the CN–RU corridor alone registering $3.5B in 2024 customs flows. However, Russian-origin aluminium faces significant sanctions exposure in Western markets. Procurement teams sourcing for EU or US end-use must conduct rigorous due diligence or avoid this origin entirely.
- Canada (13.4% share, 25 markets): The dominant supplier to the United States — the US–CA corridor reached $4.6B in 2024, by far the largest single bilateral flow globally. Canadian smelters benefit from abundant hydroelectric power, giving them a structurally lower carbon intensity and materially lower energy cost base than coal-powered competitors.
- India (9.0% share, 71 markets): The widest geographic reach of any major exporter, supplying 71 import markets. Indian producers are cost-competitive on labour and bauxite access, though their coal-heavy energy mix creates increasing exposure to carbon border adjustment mechanisms. The KR–IN corridor was valued at $553M in 2024.
- Australia (8.2% share, 28 markets): A reliable, sanctions-clean origin with strong positioning into Northeast Asian markets. Australia supplied $915M to South Korea and $706M to Japan in 2024 customs data, reflecting deep integration with regional manufacturing supply chains.
- UAE (6.1% share, 44 markets): A significant re-export and transshipment hub. The TR–AE corridor ($644M in 2024) warrants close scrutiny of actual smelting origin, as UAE-routed material may originate elsewhere. Verify certificates of origin carefully.
- South Africa (5.6%), Mozambique (4.9%), Netherlands (5.0%): South Africa and Mozambique host large hydropower-fed smelters with competitive cost structures. The Netherlands acts primarily as an intra-EU distribution node, with the DE–NL corridor at $757M reflecting downstream redistribution rather than domestic smelting.
Import Duty Rates and Trade Agreements
The EU applies a standard MFN import duty of 3.0% across all member states for HS 760110, applicable to origins without a preferential trade agreement. This rate applies uniformly whether importing into Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, or any other EU member state.
Beyond the headline tariff, EU importers must now account for the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), which entered its transitional reporting phase in 2023 and moves to full financial liability. Aluminium is a CBAM-covered sector, meaning embedded carbon intensity of the supplying smelter directly affects landed cost. Low-carbon origins such as Canada (hydro) and Iceland (geothermal — the NL–IS corridor was $979M in 2024) are structurally advantaged under this framework.
In the United States, Section 232 tariffs remain active, though the US–Canada corridor benefits from USMCA exemptions that make Canadian supply materially more cost-effective than MFN alternatives. Anti-dumping and countervailing duty orders are in force against several origins including China, and trade enforcement is active. Importers should check the USITC AD/CVD database before finalising supplier agreements.
Cost Drivers and Price Outlook
LME aluminium is the primary price benchmark for HS 760110, currently at approximately $3,654/MT — up 1.7% month-on-month as of May 2026 data. Key variables to monitor include:
- Alumina feedstock price: Alumina typically represents 30–40% of smelting cash cost. Tightness in the seaborne alumina market flows directly into ingot premiums.
- Electricity costs: Smelters are among the most power-intensive industrial facilities globally. Energy price spikes — particularly in Europe — can force curtailments and tighten regional supply rapidly.
- China production quotas: Although China is not a significant net exporter of primary ingot, its domestic production policy sets the global demand-supply balance for alumina and semi-fabricated products.
- USD exchange rate: LME pricing in USD means a weaker dollar is structurally supportive of aluminium prices in local currency terms for non-US buyers.
- Carbon policy: EU CBAM and emerging carbon pricing in other jurisdictions are beginning to differentiate pricing by origin, rewarding low-carbon smelters with a growing premium.
Compliance and Sourcing Considerations
HS 760110 carries a HIGH transshipment risk rating. Traders frequently route Russian or sanctioned-origin material through intermediary jurisdictions — notably the UAE, Turkey, and parts of Southeast Asia — to obscure origin and access lower duty rates or avoid trade restrictions. This is a material compliance exposure for importers in the EU, UK, and US.
Practical steps to mitigate transshipment risk include: requiring mill certificates traceable to the named smelter, requesting independent inspection at load port, cross-referencing declared origin with shipping routes and vessel history, and using trade intelligence platforms to flag anomalous corridor patterns. Customs authorities in the EU and US are actively targeting aluminium for origin fraud enforcement.
Russian-origin aluminium currently sits in a complex compliance zone — not universally sanctioned but subject to heightened scrutiny, individual member state restrictions, and reputational risk for Western-listed companies. Legal review is strongly recommended before procuring from this origin.
How to Source Primary Aluminium Ingot Efficiently
Effective procurement for HS 760110 starts with origin clarity. Define your compliance perimeter first — which origins are permissible given your end-market, customer requirements, and ESG commitments — before benchmarking price.
- Benchmark landed cost inclusive of MFN or preferential duty, freight, port handling, and CBAM liability (for EU destinations). Headline LME price alone is not sufficient for cost comparison.
- Prioritise suppliers with independently verified smelter certificates and established audit trails. Third-party inspection at origin is standard practice for large volume contracts.
- Diversify across at least two origin regions to reduce single-source concentration risk. Canada and Australia represent low-risk, relatively low-carbon alternatives for buyers seeking to reduce Russian or opaque-origin exposure.
- Monitor LME aluminium and alumina price indices on a rolling basis. Fixing price on long-term contracts without price review clauses has historically resulted in significant out-of-market exposure during commodity cycles.
- Use customs trade flow data to validate supplier claims about production capacity, export volumes, and market reach. Discrepancies between declared volumes and statistical trade data are a red flag.
Get a free sourcing intelligence report for HS 760110 at Logitality.com